Mercury Fillings Seem Safer over Time
A study in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology finds that mercury on the surface of dental fillings slowly turns to an inert sulfide compound, which should keep the mercury from harming the nervous system. Molly Webster reports
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The element mercury has been shown to damage the human nervous system. Yet, since 1856, mercury amalgam is “the” filling dentists have used to repair our teeth. Now a study in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology indicates that mercury fillings actually lose their toxic potential over time.
Canadian scientists used x-ray spectroscopy to compare new mercury amalgams to those about 20 years old. After two decades, 95 percent of the elemental mercury on the surface of a filling had gone through a chemical reaction. It became beta-mercury sulfide, a black-colored solid. Which explains why fillings dull with age. And the compound isn’t absorbed by the body, which means it can’t affect the body the way elemental mercury can.
Of course, this study does not settle the question of how potentially harmful a new mercury filling is. But sulfide-rich foods, such as coffee, garlic and onions, may accelerate the change from metallic mercury into the safer sulfide. So if you have a new mercury filling, an odiferous chili dog with a cup of coffee may be just what the doctor ordered.
—Molly Webster
[The above text is an exact transcript of the audio in the podcast.]
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
