Dark Living Led to Mighty Mouse Hearing

Mice kept in total darkness for a week saw their hearing improve. Well, they heard their hearing improve. Sophie Bushwick reports

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The three blind mice should have heard the farmer's wife coming. Because a new study shows that when mice can’t see, their hearing improves.
 
Researchers kept healthy adult mice in total darkness for a week. When the mice got the lights back on, their vision quickly returned to normal—but their hearing was better.
 
The researchers also scanned the part of the mouse brains that processes auditory signals while they played a set of tones. In the temporarily blind mice, neurons reacted to the notes more quickly. The nerves also picked up softer sounds and were better at distinguishing between different tones.
 
The improved hearing wore off after a few weeks, but researchers are investigating ways to make it permanent. The study is published in the journal Neuron. [Emily Petrus et al., Crossmodal Induction of Thalamocortical Potentiation Leads to Enhanced Information Processing in the Auditory Cortex]

 Previously, the neurons in this part of the brain were considered incapable of changing after childhood. But the findings show the brain is more flexible than we thought. And they also suggest that if you can't hear me clearly, try turning out the lights.

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe