New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Microbe Battery Makes Wastewater Worthwhile

By producing electricity from the organic matter in wastewater, a new microbial battery may more than cover the costs of water purification. Sophie Bushwick reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Developed countries spend about 3 percent of all their electrical power treating wastewater. The juice  purifies contaminated material so it can be returned safely to the environment. Now researchers think they can turn this power drain into a power source. Because a new kind of battery uses microbes to produce electricity from wastewater. The work is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Xing Xie et al., Microbial battery for efficient energy recovery]

Like us, some microbes draw their energy from organic matter. And wastewater is chock full of such fuel.

So scientists gave microorganisms polluted water and wired them up. When the microbes harvested electrons, the particles traveled through the electronic components to power a battery. This system had a net efficiency of 30 percent, about the same as a commercial solar cell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In theory, microbial batteries like this one could eventually be made more efficient, producing enough electricity to power the treatment of the wastewater three times over. Which gives a whole new meaning to the saying, “Waste not, want not.”

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe