Microsoft Reaches into Purse for Apps

Microsoft's Windows Phone needs more apps, for which Microsoft--unlike Apple or Google--is paying developers. Larry Greenemeier reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Smart phone and tablet users will download nearly 36 billion mobile apps this year, according to Allied Business Intelligence. The lion's share will be for Apple and Google Android gadgets. Only about 2 percent will be apps for the Microsoft Windows Phone.

Why's Microsoft so far behind? For starters there aren't any tablets running Windows Phone. And there aren't nearly as many handsets using Windows Phone as there are running iOS or Android. Microsoft offers about 70,000 mobile apps, compared to Google's 400,000 and Apple's 600,000 for phones and tablets.

Microsoft's solution has been to pay developers to write Windows Phone apps, according to The New York Times.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Software developers have the right to get paid for their work of course. Still, neither Apple nor Google pay for the nearly one million apps they offer. And developers are practically beating down their doors.

The outlook's not all bad for Microsoft. The company should get a boost with this week's launch of the Nokia Lumia 900 Windows smart phone. Nokia expects to sell 27 million of them this year. Apps sold separately.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe