Mole's Extra Finger Is Wrist Bone-us

What looks like the thumb on six-fingered moles is really a giant wrist bone that develops separately from the five true fingers. Steve Mirsky reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Former major league pitcher Antonio Alfonseca had six fingers on each hand. One of his coaches was once asked about the consequences of Alfonseca having six fingers and replied, “He can’t flip you off.” Think about it.

Well, neither can many moles. Because most individuals of the type called talpid moles also apparently have six fingers on each foot. Or at least it looks that way. Now a study shows that they really only have the regular old five true fingers. The real thumb looks like the other four fingers, and what appears to be the thumb is actually a much larger-than-normal version of the radial sesamoid bone of the wrist. The finding is in the Royal Society journal Biology Letters. [Christian Mitgutsch et al., "Circumenting the polydactyly ‘constraint’: The mole’s ‘thumb’"]

The fake thumb has no joints, a dead giveaway that it’s not a real finger. And molecular markers show that the five true fingers develop together in a mole embryo, with the outsized sesamoid cropping up later. The arrangement is probably an advantage for an animal that spends a lot of time digging. And doesn’t convey displeasure with hand signals.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe