More Football Players Found to Suffer from Degenerative Disease
The Canadian Sports Concussion Project announced the results from brain autopsies of four CFL football players. Two of the players suffered from the degenerative disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Christie Nicholson reports

SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Mind
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
On February 17 former Chicago Bears football player Dave
Duerson killed himself with a gun shot to the chest.
Doctors later found that Duersonhad a condition in common with
more than 20 other dead football players in the U.S.: Chronic
Traumatic Encephalopathy or CTE, a degenerative disease linked to impulsive behavior, depression and dementia. And Duerson thought he had it. Which is why he took great care to leave his brain intact for study.
And concerns have been growing that the concussions and other
head injuries that are common in the NFL might be to blame.
The other week the Canadian Sports Concussion Project announced
the results from brain autopsies of four CFL football players.
Bobby Kuntz, a former Toronto Argonaut and Jay Roberts, who
played for the Ottawa Roughriders, showed classic signs of
CTE. But Peter Ribbons, a Winnipeg Blue Bomber, and Tony
Proudfoot, from the Montreal Alloettes, showed no signs. All
four played when it was common to spear opponents head-first
tackles.
The Canadian Project seeks more brain donations from former
contact sport athletes. To try to find out why some seem able to
avoid CTE, while others tragically are not.
—Christie Nicholson
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber