More Fronts in Fight against Malaria

World Malaria Day brought awareness of the unorthodox biomedical ideas that are joining the search for a vaccine. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

April 25th was World Malaria Day. The mosquito-borne disease is still one of the biggest killers in developing countries with a death toll of a million each year. But there’s an international push for a multi-front war on malaria, ranging from cheap and effective bed netting to the development of a vaccine. The Gates Foundation has bet on vaccines, but is also funding less conventional scientific approaches.

For example, a scientist at Colorado State University is working on making human blood a mosquito killer. Some drugs already distributed in the developing world to combat parasites such as hookworm are also toxic to the malaria-transmitting Anopheles mosquito. The mosquito bites, and the drug in the blood kills it. Researchers are investigating how this approach could be applied and expanded.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Another team from the University of Washington discovered that the malaria parasite in Asia outsmarts drugs and develops resistance much more quickly than in other parts of the world. They’ve been investigating the mechanism of action to be able to figure out a way to block that resistance.

There is hope: in recent years, the Maldives, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates have eliminated malaria.

—Cynthia Graber

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe