Mouse Study: Yo-Yo Dieting Beats Not Dieting at All
Mice fed an alternating high-fat and low-fat diet lived almost as long as mice on a constant low-fat diet--and longer than mice on a constant high-fat diet. Katherine Harmon reports
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Health
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Sticking with a diet can be tough. Which is why so many people end up on the dreaded yo-yo track, dieting for awhile, gaining weight when they stop, then dieting again.
Yo-yo dieting has been thought to be unhealthy. But a new study with mice suggests it’s not so bad—and that it could make for a much longer life than never cutting calories at all.
The research looked at mice that always got a healthful, low-fat diet, those that only ate high-fat food, and others that spent their whole lives switching between low-fat food one month and high-fat food the next.
The yo-yoers lived almost as long as the mice given a consistently low-fat diet. That’s not saying that the yo-yoing mice were healthy. During their high-fat periods, they were overweight and diabetic. The new research was presented earlier this week at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The researchers say people shouldn’t accept yo-yo dieting as the norm. But the findings should encourage overweight people to try dieting even if they’re concerned that they won’t stick with it. And people who've lost weight and gained it back shouldn’t be afraid to give it another try.
—Katherine Harmon
[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
