New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Musical Pitch Perception May Have Long Evolutionary History

A tiny primate, the marmoset, appears to process pitch perception the same way we do, implying that the ability evolved in a common ancestor at least 40 million years ago.

 

COMSTOCK IMAGES (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

The ability to distinguish between sounds of varying pitch makes people capable of producing and understanding speech and music. And the way we are able to process pitch has been thought to be unique to our big-brained species.
 

But now, there’s evidence that a tiny monkey—the common marmoset from Brazil—can distinguish pitch the same way we do. That’s according to a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Xindong Song et al, Complex pitch perception mechanisms are shared by humans and a New World monkey]
 

Ten years ago, researchers identified a region of the marmoset brain that appeared to process pitch. But they needed to confirm that the animals did indeed notice changes in pitch—which presented a challenge: they had to find a way to get the animal to indicate that it had heard something. So they trained the marmosets to respond to a change in pitch with a behavior—specifically, they would lick a waterspout.
 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers then had the animals listen to a series of notes with the same pitch. And, at random, they’d change it up. “Just like, for example, when I say, ‘ma ma ma MA.’ Right, at some point I make the pitch a little higher.” Johns Hopkins neuroscientist Xiaoqin Wang, lead researcher of the study. The actual difference in pitch, he says, was much smaller than that. But you get the idea. “And, when the animal hears that change, it will lick the waterspout to indicate they hear the difference.” Which the miniscule monkeys indeed did.
 

Because both we and marmosets have this talent, the ability likely evolved in a common ancestor long-ago—this type of pitch perception may thus go back more than 40 million years ago, much earlier than previously thought. And the understanding of how the brain processes pitch may eventually explain why some people have perfect pitch, while others are tone deaf.
 

—Christine Herman
 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe