Musical Style Affects Stride Length at Constant Tempo

Even if different songs have the same number of beats per minute, marchers listening to the sound will adjust their stride length depending on the variety of music. Sophie Bushwick reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As a recent 60-Second Science podcast explained, music syncs up the heartbeats of singers. Now comes a study on music and the steps of walkers. It’s not just the beat that affects a walker's pace. Scientists discovered that even at the same tempo, different types of music affect stride differently. The study is in the journal PLoS ONE. [Marc Leman et al., Activating and Relaxing Music Entrains the Speed of Beat Synchronized Walking]

Researchers created 52 different 30-second musical excerpts. Although all songs shared the same tempo and meter, they ranged from a simple metronome ticking to a traditional Irish tune to Van Halen. As subjects listened, they walked around an open field wearing sensors to measure stride length and timing. Afterwards, they rated each song with qualitative descriptions.

Although the participants stepped to the same beat for each song, they lengthened or shortened their strides for different types of music, which modified their speed. In general, longer strides accompanied songs rated as aggressive and loud. So if you want to pick up the pace, don't just choose a fast jam—find one that pumps up your energy as well.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe