Oil from the BP Disaster May Remain Thick on the Seafloor

Soil samples taken from a 50-mile radius around the Macondo well reveal striped layers of thick goo, possibly containing oil. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The headlines might not be screaming at us anymore, but we can’t simply forget the possible long-term impact of the BP oil disaster. For instance, here’s one question we might ask: Where’s all the oil now?

Well, according to a post by journalist Barry Yeoman in OnEarth.org the oil might be sitting in thick layers on the sea floor. Yeoman sat in on a meeting where Vernon Asper, professor of marine sciences at University of Southern Mississippi, presented recent research.

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using a BP-funded multicorer they got underwater soil samples.   Soil taken from a site 16 nautical miles from the Macondo well is significantly striped. Meaning on the bottom is mud, then a layer of something they presume to be oil, and on top of that a two-inch thick goop that Asper calls “slime snot,” possibly made up of oil and bacteria. They are currently analyzing it to confirm exactly what’s in this slime snot.


Regardless, this goo is no good for life. Worms, other deep-living organisms and sediment require oxygen that will not reach them through the slime. And of course this will impact up the food chain, to fish and even sperm whales who dive deep to graze the ocean floor.

—Christie Nicholson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe