Orchids Share Pollinators but Guard Their Fungi

Side-by-side orchids can be pollinated by the same bee, which keeps the pollens distinct, but each orchid species will co-exist with a unique nutrient-supplying fungus. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Orchids are among the most successful flowering plants, with more than 22,000 species around the world. And that’s not just because of the obsession they inspire in their human fans.

Researchers spent 10 years studying orchids in South Africa, where the flowers are particularly diverse. The scientists say orchids became successful by changing or sharing pollinators, but staying loyal to fungi. Here’s one example. There are two species of orchids that live very close together in South Africa. One orchid deposits its pollen on a particular bee’s front legs. The other leaves pollen only on the bee’s abdomen. The same bee thus serves two different species and keeps the pollen separate.

But when it comes to fungi—which supply the orchid with nutrients—the flowers are much more faithful. They might switch pollinators if transplanted, but they stick with the same fungus species. And one orchid species uses different fungi than a close orchid neighbor, to prevent competing for the same nutrients. The research was published in The American Naturalist. [Richard Waterman et al., "The Effects of Above- And Belowground Mutualisms On Orchid Speciation and Coexistence"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists say the findings help explain how so many species of orchids developed, and can exist so close together. The human mania for orchids, however, remains mysterious.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe