Our Bodies, Our Culture

How we understand the location of our own body in space is culturally dependent. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

That's Beyonce singing her hit Irreplacable. And it goes with dance moves that involve—you guessed it—moving to the left.

But what Beyonce, and many of us for that matter, might not realize is that some people may not have any idea what “to the left” means with respect to the location of their own bodies in space.

Now one would think knowing the position of where we move our feet and hands is pretty much the same across cultures. Meaning it’s “egocentric,” and we’d describe moving our feet to the left relative to us, and not to the east relative to a compass.

But a new study finds that the way children understand their own body movement actually depends on their culture.  The research will appear in the journal Current Biology.

When German children were taught to move their hands in a right-left-right-right motion, as part of a dance choreography, they maintained this movement even after changing their body orientation by 180 degrees.

But children from the Akhoe Hai || om, a hunter-gatherer tribe from Namibia, changed the right-left-right-right sequence to the exact opposite (left-right-left-left) when they turned their bodies 180 degrees. 

This means that they were referencing the movement of their own limbs based on some external reference in their environment…meaning east, west, north, south.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study author notes that this finding is a reminder of just how plastic the human mind is, and of the wide diversity in human cognition across cultures.

And a reminder to Beyonce that "to the left, to the left" is absolutely replaceable, depending on who you are talking to.

—Christie Nicholson

[The above text is an exact transcript of the audio in the podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe