Pablo Escobar’s Hippos Could Endanger Colombian Ecology

Hippos that escaped from drug kingpin Pablo Escobar’s private zoo are reproducing in the wild. And with increasing numbers, they could threaten ecosystems.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Around 115 miles east of Medellín, in Colombia, sits the enormous hacienda built by the drug lord Pablo Escobar—who had his own personal zoo, which included hippos. When Escobar’s empire fell, most of the exotic animals were safely relocated—except for the hippos, who eventually escaped.

“So he brought four from a zoo in the U.S. to Colombia, and they lived at his ranch. And they’ve grown slowly but steadily.”

Jonathan Shurin, ecologist from the University of California in San Diego.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The original population of four in 1981 is estimated to be at least 80 now. Hippos have a tremendous influence on their native ecosystems in Africa, so Shurin wanted to see how they might be affecting their new ecosystem in Colombia.

“It shouldn’t be a surprise to anybody that hippos poop in the water in South America, just as they do in Africa.”

Hippos on both continents wallow in ponds and lakes, where their droppings release a tremendous amount of nutrients into the water.

“That imported material stimulates photosynthesis of algae and aquatic plants and also microbial bacterial production—bacteria that are living off of the organic matter that’s imported.”

And that’s where the hippos can cause ecological trouble. If there is too much photosynthesis occurring, then the water becomes full of oxygen during the daytime. But at night, when the sun goes down, and the plants and algae stop releasing oxygen into the water, a phenomenon called eutrophication occurs. All the creatures that consume oxygen keep consuming it, and the overall amount of oxygen dissolved in the water becomes critically low.

“The oxygen dropping low enough—you can have all the fish sort of croaking and going belly-up.”

The researchers also say the situation provides a unique glimpse into the way that massive mammals like mammoths and mastodons, long extinct in the New World, may have influenced their habitats prior to their extinction.

But they also note that unless we can somehow curtail their population growth, the hippo population could explode in the next couple of decades—at which point, they will disrupt larger and wilder river systems. The study is in the journal Ecology. [Jonathan B. Shurin et al., Ecosystem effects of the world’s largest invasive animal]

Lethal control isn’t a popular management strategy among people who love hippos or see them as a valuable tourism attraction. But the question is when, not if, the hippos become detrimental to Colombian ecology—which means that folks should be thinking about the best way to solve the problem now, when there are fewer than a hundred hippos to manage and not thousands.

—Jason G. Goldman

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe