Panic Attack Sufferers Are Unaware of Symptoms

Panic attacks seem to come out of nowhere, but research finds symptoms appear up to one hour before the sufferer is aware of the attack. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A panic attack seems to come out of the blue. But new research
finds that the body gives unmistakable clues long before an
attack hits.

Scientists used mobile sensors to monitor the respiration and
heart rates of 43 panic attack sufferers for 24 hours during their
regular activities. And they found that subjects who wound
up having an attack actually had significant instability in their
physiology up to an hour before they felt the panic. The study is
published in the journal Biological Psychiatry.

The researchers found that subjects had no awareness of
increasing changes—like chest pain, dizziness, trembling, hot
flashes—until 60 minutes after the symptoms began.

Some panic attacks are predictable, like when a claustrophobic steps into a crowded elevator. But those who get unexpected attacks describe it as: I was just watching TV and I got a rush out of nowhere.

The study authors note that this lack of awareness may explain
why meds work better for sufferers than cognitive behavioral
therapy does: How is the patient supposed to work on
something that they are unaware is already in progress?

—Christie Nicholson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe