Physicists Tackle Voiding Urination Splash-Back

Close examination of slow-mo video of simulated urine streams offers insights into how to avoid trouser-tainting backscatter. Sophie Bushwick reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Gentlemen, do you suffer from...splash-back? You know, the spray that flies up when urine stream hits urinal or toilet bowl. Well, help is at hand. Researchers at Brigham Young University have figured out how to minimize splash-back.

First the scientists simulated a male’s flow. They used high speed cameras to record streams of colored water hitting various targets at different angles and distances.

Turns out the streams travel only six or seven inches before breaking up into droplets. As the stream's source moves farther away, the impact velocity of the droplets increases, and they produce larger splashes. The work will be presented at a meeting of the American Physical Society's Division of Fluid Dynamics. [Randy Hurd et al., Urinal Dynamics]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Clearly, reducing stream distance will cut down on splash-back. Which is why the researchers suggest that men sit rather than stand. But if you do stand, try to create a smaller angle between the urine stream and the surface, and aim for the porcelain rather than the water. That way, you won't sprinkle when you tinkle.

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe