Polar Bears Must Work Harder on Faster Sea Ice Treadmill

Thinner sea ice is getting pushed farther by Arctic winds, which makes polar bears walk more to stay in the same place, increasing their need for food.

 

PHOTODISC (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Polar bears live on floating rafts of sea ice, hunting for seals. But in the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska, the cold polar wind constantly blows that ice from east to west. Which means that the polar bears there are on a kind of treadmill.  

 

“If the bears don’t compensate that drift, they would all drift to Russia. So over the course of a year they need to walk back against that prevailing drift to remain in the Alaska territories.” David Douglas, a biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Juneau, Alaska.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Recently, researchers realized that the ice drift in this part of the Arctic Ocean has accelerated from about three kilometers per day up to five. That’s probably because climate change has made the sea ice thinner and easier for the winds to push. And that means the polar bear treadmill has sped up too.

 

Douglas and his colleagues tracked Alaskan polar bears fitted with radio collars. They found that the animals are working harder than ever to compensate for the faster drift. And just like when we exercise, bears have to eat more food to make up for the extra calories they’re burning—between one and four more seals per year, depending on whether the bears are single or raising cubs.

 

“While that may not seem like a lot of seals or a big demand, it also comes at a time when the habitat that they have to hunt in is shrinking. So they have less area on which to hunt seals, at the same time needing to hunt more.”

 

Douglas, after presenting the research December 15th at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco. [David Douglas et al, Increased Arctic Sea Ice Drift Alters Polar Bear Movements and Energetics]

 

He’s particularly worried that the changes in sea ice may hurt young bears’ chances of survival, especially in the southern Beaufort Sea, north of Prudhoe Bay. Researchers have studied these bears for more than 30 years, and have watched their numbers decline.

 

“We didn’t see this coming three decades ago when we started tracking bears. We thought we were simply getting baseline data on a population, and never foresaw that the Arctic would undergo such dramatic change.” That, like the sea ice, may be accelerating.

 

—Julia Rosen

 

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe