Pterodactyls' Ptough Ptakeoffs
Johns Hopkins researcher Michael Habib contends that the weight carried by most pterosaurs meant that they needed to push off the ground with all four limbs to achieve takeoff (in a study published in the German journal Zitteliana Reihe B: Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung fur Palaontologie und Geologie). Karen Hopkin reports, with additional analysis by Maria Bamford
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]
A bird in flight is a thing of beauty. Even their takeoffs and landings usually look effortless. But pterodactyls? Well, that’s another story. Scientists have long assumed that pterodactyls, also called pterosaurs, flew just like birds, and launched themselves using their hind legs. Now a biologist at Johns Hopkins says that can’t be true. Instead, he says that pterosaurs needed all four limbs for liftoff.
Modern birds use their legs to launch and their wings to stay aloft. Once they’re in the air, their hind limbs are essentially payload, carried along for the ride. That arrangement presents a problem. A bird’s legs have to be muscular enough to get Tweety off the ground, but not so big that they drag him down. That limits how big a bird can be. Some pterosaurs, on the other hand, were the size of a giraffe. And looking at the bones of three different pterodactyl species, the Hopkins scientist concludes that there’s no way those legs were strong enough to get that bulk airborne. Instead, he says a pterosaur used all four limbs, leapfrogging forward on its knuckles, to propel itself into the air. Maybe not a thing of beauty. But it must have been something to see.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
—Karen Hopkin
60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:
RSS | iTunes
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
