Restoring Movement in Paralyzed Limbs

A study published in Nature shows how an artificial connection restores movement in paralyzed limbs. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]


Studies have shown that monkeys can control robotic arms and computer cursors with the electrical impulses of their own thoughts. So we know there's a way to turn the activity of neurons into a signal that can control movement of a mechanical object—but what about movement in actual muscle?

A report in the journal Nature shows that it is indeed possible to route a brain signal via an artificial connection to move paralyzed muscles.

The work was done with monkeys.  Researchers recorded electrical activity in a monkey's brain as it moved a computer cursor, after which they used a nerve block to temporarily paralyze the monkey's wrists so it couldn't manipulate the cursor. They then created a new electronic connection from a single neuron to the wrist muscles. This detour bypassed the anaesthetized nerves that caused the temporary paralysis.

Within minutes monkeys started using their wrist muscles again to play a video game.

The researchers noted that the neurons used in the detour are not normally associated with wrist movement. They said that nearly any motor cortex cell can be "trained" to control any muscle.

Human clinical studies are still a long way off, but this proof of concept provides hope for the hundreds of thousands of people immobilized from spinal cord injuries or strokes.

—Christie Nicholson


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

60-Second Psych is a weekly podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe