New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Runaway Stars May Be Fleeing Bigger Bullies

A class of wandering stars called OB runaways may have been thrown from home by competing binary star systems that got too close. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Back in the 1950s astronomers discovered a strange population of stars on the lam. Known as OB runaways, these massive stars tear through space at surprisingly high speed—sometimes hundreds of kilometers per second. 

How they got going so fast is an open question. It's been proposed that other, exploding stars could be the reason. A supernova, after all, packs enough punch to launch a neighboring star outward at high speed. But a new study published online by the journal Science supports an alternative idea. [Michiko S. Fujii and Simon Portegies Zwart, "The Origin of OB Runaway Stars"]

The mechanism involves a bully binary—that's the astronomers' actual language. The bully is a pair of supersize stars orbiting each other within a larger star cluster. If a third star ventures too close, the bully binary flings it clear like a slingshot. Voila! A runaway. According to the new study, bully binaries form naturally and can each fling out dozens of runaways. And the number of massive stars ejected this way matches up well with actual observations of OB runaways.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So who can blame the runaway stars for fleeing an unfair fight? As it's been said: "Discretion is the better part of valor."

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.] 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe