Sauropod Neck Bones Were Really Tendons

Microscopic analysis of what were thought to be thin riblike bones that ran the length of sauropods' necks show them to be ossified tendons. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sauropods like Brachiosaurus and Diplodocus were the biggest beasts to ever roam the Earth. And these dinosaurs had enormously long necks. Which poses an anatomical problem: they needed to move their necks side to side and up and down to graze, but that requires lots of muscles. And muscles are heavy. So how did they keep their heads from dragging on the ground?

It looked like their secret was thin riblike bones—some up to 10 feet long—that ran the length of the sauropods' necks. Because when researchers examined slices of those bones under the microscope, they found that they aren't normal bone at all—they're ossified tendons. That’s according to a study in the journal Biology Letters. [Nicole Klein, Andreas Christian and P. Martin Sander, Histology shows that elongated neck ribs in sauropod dinosaurs are ossified tendons]

The researchers think those long tendons may have allowed the dinos to shift muscle mass from their necks onto their bodies—giving them a sort of "remote control" over their necks, while making the neck lighter and more flexible. Not too different, in fact, from how herons do it today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And that, the authors say, may have been the sauropods' key innovation. Helping them to graze more efficiently, and stay neck and neck with other dinos.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe