Sea Lampreys Flee Death Smells

The smell of rotting sea lampreys drives away the live ones, which could be a useful strategy for controlling the invasive pests. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sea lampreys leave a swath of destruction as the invasive species chomps through the Great Lakes. Attempts to manage them have relied in part on pheromones that attract the animals. After being trapped, they’re either killed or sterilized and released. But these approaches aren’t always effective.

Now there may be a new way to get rid of the lampreys—with the stench of death.

Scientists had seen that dead sea lampreys in a tank caused live ones to freak out and try to escape. So researchers extracted chemical compounds from 10 putrefying lamprey carcasses. They exposed live ones to either the smell of their dead brethren or an ethanol control. They didn’t react to the ethanol, but when they smelled death, they quickly swam the other way.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This effect lasted throughout the entire time the scent was present, and even when the smell was highly diluted. The research was published in the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. [C. Michael Wagner, Eric Stroud and Trevor Meckley, "A deathly odor suggests a new sustainable tool for controlling a costly invasive species"]

The scientists say their finding could be used to drive lampreys into an area where they could be captured and killed. All while trying to escape from their own imminent smell of death.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe