New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Ships at Sea Stoke Lightning Strikes

Exhaust fumes from oceangoing vessels lead to an almost doubling of lightning activity over shipping lanes compared to adjacent areas of the sea.

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When lightning sparks across the sky, it sends out low-frequency radio waves that researchers can use to determine its location. Recently, scientists were looking over a map of lightning activity, when they noticed something strange: narrow lines of increased lightning frequency stretching across the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea. Straight features like these are rare on a spherical, spinning planet, except where humans are up to something. In this case, sending ships across the sea.

“I had pretty immediately in my mind postulated that this was a result of the pollution from ship exhaust influencing the way the storms develop.”

Joel Thornton, an atmospheric chemist at the University of Washington.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“That hypothesis had already been put out generally in the field more than a decade ago. But we had been lacking clear evidence that this was happening on a large-scale, long-time horizon.”

The new maps changed that. Thornton and his team found that, on average, lightning activity almost doubled over shipping lanes compared to adjacent areas of the ocean.

The researchers ruled out natural explanations for the pattern, and concluded it must be related to ship exhaust. Exhaust increases the number of tiny particles in the air, on which water vapor condenses to form cloud droplets. Spreading the same amount of water over more particles leads to smaller droplets, which get lifted by updrafts until they reach altitudes cold enough for them to freeze. For reasons scientists still don’t fully understand, interactions between these ice particles and water droplets inside the cloud builds up electrical charges—and produce lightning.

Thornton says the ship tracks provide a unique opportunity to isolate the effects of pollution from all the other factors normally at play in storms.  

“From a science standpoint it’s exciting that we have this ongoing experiment where we know roughly how much particle pollution is being put into the atmosphere, we have a good signature that it’s influencing the nature of storms, and then we can use this experiment as a way to improve our understanding of how pollution affects the development of storms and their intensity.”

The research was published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. [Joel A. Thornton et al., Lightning enhancement over major oceanic shipping lanes]

The International Maritime Organization recently adopted a rule that will force ships to start using fuels with lower sulfur content. That change will help reduce particle pollution—and should provide Thornton with new data.

“So, if they all do it at the same time in 2020, or even if they stagger it in over the period of a few years, the lightning response should be essentially immediate.”

The cleaner fuel standards will help the environment, and boost lightning science, too.

—Julia Rosen

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe