Shoo Away Asteroids with a Coat of Paint

Heat radiating from an asteroid imparts a tiny push to the rock, meaning that we could subtly steer an asteroid by changing its reflectance. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Since that meteor streaked through Russian skies on February 15th a lot of people have been thinking about asteroid defense.

If an inbound space rock were discovered early enough, a spacecraft could divert it any number of ways: by nuking it, smashing into it or tugging it off course. Then there’s an idea advocated by aerospace engineer David Hyland of Texas A&M University: just spray a coat of paint on the asteroid and let the sun do the rest.

The proposal relies on the so-called Yarkovsky effect. The hottest part of an asteroid—where it’s afternoon, asteroid local time—radiates the most heat into space, and those thermal photons impart a gentle recoil force. It’s incredibly subtle, but it’s constant, so the Yarkovsky effect can significantly change an asteroid’s orbit over time.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new study in the journal Icarus identifies more than 20 asteroids that have been noticeably shifted by the Yarkovsky effect, naturally. [Davide Farnocchia et al., Near-Earth Asteroids with measurable Yarkovsky effect] Paint would enhance or reduce the effect by changing an inbound asteroid’s reflectance, thereby steering it away from us.

Currently no asteroids that we know of present a real threat to Earth. But it’s good to be prepared. Ask the dinosaurs.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe