Shoot a Space Invader to Drive at Night

A study in the journal Nature Neuroscience suggests that playing action-filled video games improves contrast vision, especially useful in low visibility conditions. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

In 2005, Steven Johnson wrote a book called Everything Bad is Good For You. He proposed that popular culture is actually making us smarter. Because things like video games have gotten so complex, they force us to keep our brains in gear.

Well, you can argue with his ideas about pop culture and intelligence—many people have. But now a new study, published in Nature Neuroscience, suggests that video gaming can improve not your IQ, but your eyesight.

The researchers studied people who are expert video gamers, players who log more than 5 hours of action games a week. And they discovered that these experts have better contrast vision than non-gamers. Such contrast sensitivity comes in handy in real life for driving at night or in poor visibility. And it’s that aspect of vision that’s one of the first to go as we age.

The scientists also found that for non-gamers, a daily workout on the computer boosted their contrast vision, an improvement that then lasted for months. Playing nonaction video games didn’t help. It was engaging in those action-filled death matches that did the trick. So, sure, keep munching those carrots. But maybe shoot down a few enemy spacecraft before you drive in the dark.

—Karen Hopkin

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe