New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Short-Term Fasting Made Mice Healthier

Mice that ate their entire food for the day in an eight-to-12-hour window had better markers for health than did mice free to eat whenever they wanted. Steve Mirsky reports
 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“When it comes to diet, weight gain and diabetes, it’s not just what we eat—but when we eat.”

Satchidananda Panda, a researcher at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California.

Panda and his team had mice engage in what’s called time-restricted-feeding. That is, the mice consumed all their daily calories in an eight-to-12-hour window. And they wound up with markers for health that were better than those of mice free to eat whenever they wanted. For example, time-restricted-feeding reduced whole body fat, inflammation and insulin resistance and improved the mice’s glucose tolerance.

“We were surprised to find that the benefits of time restriction persist even if the mice take the weekends off.” So binging on Saturday and Sunday did not wipe out the positive effects. The study is in the journal Cell Metabolism. [Amandine Chaix et al, Time-Restricted Feeding Is a Preventative and Therapeutic Intervention against Diverse Nutritional Challenges]

“What is very exciting about this is that it’s much easier to adopt than most of the lifestyle modifications that people are recommended in doctors’ offices every day.”

Gastroenterologist Amir Zarrinpar, one of the study’s authors.

“So with this type of therapy you don’t really have to calorie count. What really this works on is your own biology and letting your body use its own evolutionary-developed metabolic pathways to shuttle energy appropriately.”

“These findings are very exciting, but they’re in mice. We need to do further experiments to make sure that they also lead to therapies in humans.”

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Audio of Panda and Zarrinpar supplied by Salk Institute for Biological Studies.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe