Short-Term Fasting Made Mice Healthier

Mice that ate their entire food for the day in an eight-to-12-hour window had better markers for health than did mice free to eat whenever they wanted. Steve Mirsky reports
 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“When it comes to diet, weight gain and diabetes, it’s not just what we eat—but when we eat.”

Satchidananda Panda, a researcher at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California.

Panda and his team had mice engage in what’s called time-restricted-feeding. That is, the mice consumed all their daily calories in an eight-to-12-hour window. And they wound up with markers for health that were better than those of mice free to eat whenever they wanted. For example, time-restricted-feeding reduced whole body fat, inflammation and insulin resistance and improved the mice’s glucose tolerance.

“We were surprised to find that the benefits of time restriction persist even if the mice take the weekends off.” So binging on Saturday and Sunday did not wipe out the positive effects. The study is in the journal Cell Metabolism. [Amandine Chaix et al, Time-Restricted Feeding Is a Preventative and Therapeutic Intervention against Diverse Nutritional Challenges]

“What is very exciting about this is that it’s much easier to adopt than most of the lifestyle modifications that people are recommended in doctors’ offices every day.”

Gastroenterologist Amir Zarrinpar, one of the study’s authors.

“So with this type of therapy you don’t really have to calorie count. What really this works on is your own biology and letting your body use its own evolutionary-developed metabolic pathways to shuttle energy appropriately.”

“These findings are very exciting, but they’re in mice. We need to do further experiments to make sure that they also lead to therapies in humans.”

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Audio of Panda and Zarrinpar supplied by Salk Institute for Biological Studies.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe