Simmering Planet Keeps Heating

Despite decades of warnings, greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, warming the world. Can such pollution peak this decade? David Biello asks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As delegates gather in South Africa to determine what the world's nations should do about climate change, one might wonder how we're doing? After all, scientists have advised cuts to greenhouse gas emissions since at least the 1980s.

The latest accounting shows that global CO2 emissions have increased by nearly 50 percent in the past several decades. 2010 now stands as the year with the most greenhouse gas emissions ever. The results were published today in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Burning fossil fuels released more than 36 billion metric tons of CO2 last year, mainly due to growth in China and India combined with U.S. contributions. Ongoing deforestation is a big factor, too.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Looking back to the 1960s, nothing seems to have set back emissions for long, and that includes the latest Great Recession. Other studies show that we've burned roughly half of the fossil fuels we can if we don't want the climate to warm by more than 2 degrees Celsius.

In fact, we'll need zero or negative emissions at some point and emissions to peak sometime this decade to avoid any further warming. No time like the present.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe