Smart Phone Antennas Could Double Network Capacity

A clever way to send and receive both sides of a smart phone conversation on a single frequency could double wireless network capacity. Larry Greenemeier reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More than half a billion smart phones will likely be sold in the coming year.  And all those smart phones means the infrastructure required to manage them is going to have to grow as well. Or does it?

Engineers at Rice University in Houston say they have found a way to double wireless network capacity by adding a "multiple-input multiple-output" antenna to a smart phone. This device enables full-duplex over a single frequency. [Achaleshwar Sahai, Gaurav Patel and Ashutosh Sabharwal "Pushing the limits of Full-duplex: Design and Real-Time Implementation"]

A wireless device normally needs two frequencies for full-duplex. This lets callers speak and listen at the same time, with each signal on its own frequency.

The extra antenna allows smart phones to carry two signals over a single frequency. Each signal cancels out part of the other at the receiving antenna. The sender can't hear his own voice, but he can hear the person on the other end. Without this cancellation over a single frequency, the phone would function more like a two-way radio: you could speak or listen, but not both at the same time.

The engineers have essentially found a way to double network throughput without changing the network itself. Nice trick.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe