Snapchat Makes Messages Disappear

Snapchat, a time-limited message-sharing app, has allegedly turned down billion-dollar offers from Facebook and Google. Larry Greenemeier reports.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Never post anything to social media that you wouldn’t want your mother to see. A pretty good rule of thumb, if you assume a particular post will linger in perpetuity.

A new app called Snapchat, however, argues that some photos and messages should not stay with us forever. That’s why the app lets you set an expiration of up to 10 seconds for shared content after it’s viewed. The app developers then delete these “snaps” from their servers.

Sounds like the perfect app for sexting, although Snapchat’s makers insists that’s not what it’s for. Anyone who goes that route should know Snapchat is subject to search warrants just like any other site. And they store unopened snaps for 30 days.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Facebook and Google like the app so much they each offered to snatch up Snapchat for billions of dollars. Not bad for a two-year-old company with no revenue.

Snapchat declined both offers. Maybe they want to follow Twitter’s path to a big IPO. If they’re just holding out for more money, they better hope their appeal lasts longer than one of their snaps.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.] 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe