Soda Tax Could Turn Health Profit

A penny-per-ounce tax on sweetened drinks would cut consumption, obesity and health care costs. Katherine Harmon reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sugary drinks are one of the leading culprits behind America's weight problem. Whether it's sugar-sweetened soda, sports drinks, teas or juices, we're each gulping down an average of 70,000 liquid calories each year.  

Now an analysis finds that a tax of one penny per ounce of sugar-sweetened beverage would pay off big time: it would generate $13 billion in revenue each year—and save the country at least $17 billion dollars in health care costs over 10 years. The report is in the policy journal Health Affairs. [Y. Claire Wang et al., "A Penny-per-Ounce Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Would Cut Health and Cost Burdens of Diabetes"]

An extra 68 cents per two-liter bottle would drive consumption down 15 percent. And even if Americans replaced some of those calories with other treats, the tax would still prevent an estimated 867,000 adults from becoming obese within the decade.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What to drink that won't add any pounds? Diet drinks might not offer much either, as artificial sweeteners have been linked to weight gain, too. So, perhaps a simple refreshing glass of filtered tap water is the key to making us penny-wise and pounds lighter.

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe