Some Coral Should Produce Shells in Acidifying Ocean

Of four common corals and algae tested, three still produced shells in conditions that mimic oceans if atmospheric CO2 concentrations reached 1,000 ppm. David Biello reports
 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The oceans are turning more acidic. Surface waters absorb carbon dioxide produced by the burning of fossil fuels. And those CO2 molecules react with the seawater to make carbonic acid.
 
Voilà, a more acidic ocean.
 
That's big trouble for tiny plants and animals in the sea that make shells. Because more acidic water makes it harder to produce those shells. And once the shells do form, the more acidic water also corrodes the shells. Many marine biologists have thus been anxious that climate change may mean an end to coral reefs.
 
But a set of experiments undertaken in Hawaii, Moorea and Okinawa give new hope, at least in the Pacific.
 
Four common corals and algae were subjected to conditions that mimic oceans if CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere reached 1,000 ppm, more than double the levels today. And three out of the four could still easily form their hard calcium shells even in such a more acidic ocean. [Steeve Comeau et al, Pacific-wide contrast highlights resistance of reef calcifiers to ocean acidification, in Proceedings of the Royal Society B]
 
That doesn't mean ocean acidification won't be bad for corals and algae. But it does mean that across the Pacific some of these organisms can tough it out. Whether other organisms, including us humans, could thrive in a 1,000 ppm CO2 world is another question.
 
—David Biello
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[*Clarification (7/31/14): This transcript was edited to reflect a rebroadcast of the original podcast to clarify phrasing and terminology in the original script, which inadvertently created the impression ocean water is acid rather than that it is largely neutral but becoming more acidic.]


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe