Some See Every Glass As Mostly Empty

A study finds that people with what's called a negative dispositional attitude will, as a rule, dislike, well, most everything. Erika Beras reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We all have that friend. The Debbie Downer who finds fault with sunshine and lollipops and sees a perpetually half empty glass. Well, it turns out being such a drag might be part of their individual personality—a dimension researchers are calling “dispositional attitude.”

A new study says people with a negative dispositional attitude will, as a rule, dislike things. All things. In other words, haters gonna hate.

Researchers created a scale that required people to report their attitudes towards things like architecture and camping. They found people with positive attitudes were generally open and curious, and tended to follow positive behaviors like recycling and driving carefully. The negative Nellies: not so much. The study is in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. [Justin Hepler and Dolores Albarracín, Attitudes without objects: Evidence for a dispositional attitude, its measurement, and its consequences]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers say this personality trait could also be used for marketers—rather than convincing those with a negative dispositional attitude to like their product, they could just convince them to dislike everybody else’s.

—Erika Beras

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.] 
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe