Sophisticated Sticker Spots Salmonella

An invention by physicists could make testing for bacteria as simple as slapping a sticker on food and waving a handheld scanner. Wayt Gibbs reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When I say “salmonella,” what comes to mind? Eggs? Chicken? Actually, think carrots, cucumbers, cantaloupes. It’s foods we eat raw that tend to cause the biggest salmonella outbreaks. But an invention by physicists at Auburn University could make testing for bacteria as simple as slapping on a sticker and waving a handheld scanner.

The sticker part of the system contains a tiny sliver of metallic glass. The side touching the food is coated with phage E2, a virus engineered to stick only to Salmonella typhimurium bacteria.

In the handheld scanner, a small wire coil creates an oscillating magnetic field, which makes the glass sliver in the sticker vibrate in sympathy. The coil can measure that rate of vibration.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If salmonella is present under the sticker, it gets snagged by the phage and makes the sticker a touch heavier—enough to change its vibration frequency. The scanner could pick up the shift and sound an alarm. The work appears in the Journal of Applied Physics. [Yating Chai et al., Design of a surface-scanning coil detector for direct bacteria detection on food surfaces using a magnetoelastic biosensor]

The system should work on most produce—but probably not on chicken or eggs, because they can harbor salmonella on the inside.

—Wayt Gibbs

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]   

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe