European Invasion Changed Peru's Coastline
Sections of Peru's coastline were stabilized by the activities of indigenous people, the demise of whom following the Spanish invasion led to an alteration of the geography. Cynthia Graber reports
By Cynthia Graber
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The Spanish arrival in South America changed many things—including, it seems, even the Peruvian coastline.
In dry northwestern Peru, unusual 19-mile-long sandy coastal ridges were formed through tectonic activity, El Niño storms and natural sediment deposit. The nine ridges still standing appear to have formed from 5,100 years ago until about 400 years ago. And they're topped with deposits of shells, rocks from fire pits and other human artifacts.
Scientists studying the region found that the shells are from mollusks and barnacles, and primarily of species still fished there today. They thus concluded that the shells were left by native communities who long called the region home.
The researchers also found that the clamshell and fire deposits stabilized the ridges and protected them from erosion. No such stable ridges exist along the coast from the past 400 years, after the local people died from disease or war, or were pushed inland. Any incipient ridges since were easily toppled by wind and storms.
The research is in the Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences. [Daniel F. Belknap and Daniel H. Sandweiss, Effect of the Spanish Conquest on coastal change in Northwestern Peru]
Visitors now see what they may think is a natural landscape. But its formation depended on thousands of years of human activity.
—Cynthia Graber
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
