Sperm Supply Tied to Competition

Studies in multiple species show that males may adjust sperm output when faced with romantic rivals, and females may seek more partners if males skimp. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

If you paid attention during high school biology, you probably remember that girls are born with all the eggs they’ll ever have, whereas guys are churning out sperm pretty much all the time. Now, several new studies, in animals from mice to worms, suggest that sperm supply is closely tied to demand. And that how much sperm an individual male makes may influence whether females seek multiple mates.

One study, published by the Royal Society, showed that mice make more sperm when they compete with romantic rivals. That finding is the first demonstration that a male mammal can adjust his sperm output depending on social circumstance, in this case, making more sperm to better the odds that he’ll come out on top in a reproductive show-down.

Worms take the whole supply-and-demand thing to the extreme. According to a study published in the journal Current Biology, when females aren’t around, one type of nematode worm doesn’t make any sperm at all.

That kind of abstinence may work for a nematode, but for other species being stingy with sperm may backfire. According to a paper published in Science, when male fruit flies skimp on the sperm count, females simply mate with more partners. Something male flies might keep in mind if they want to avoid heartbreak this holiday season.

—Karen Hopkin 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe