New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Sperm Supply Tied to Competition

Studies in multiple species show that males may adjust sperm output when faced with romantic rivals, and females may seek more partners if males skimp. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

If you paid attention during high school biology, you probably remember that girls are born with all the eggs they’ll ever have, whereas guys are churning out sperm pretty much all the time. Now, several new studies, in animals from mice to worms, suggest that sperm supply is closely tied to demand. And that how much sperm an individual male makes may influence whether females seek multiple mates.

One study, published by the Royal Society, showed that mice make more sperm when they compete with romantic rivals. That finding is the first demonstration that a male mammal can adjust his sperm output depending on social circumstance, in this case, making more sperm to better the odds that he’ll come out on top in a reproductive show-down.

Worms take the whole supply-and-demand thing to the extreme. According to a study published in the journal Current Biology, when females aren’t around, one type of nematode worm doesn’t make any sperm at all.

That kind of abstinence may work for a nematode, but for other species being stingy with sperm may backfire. According to a paper published in Science, when male fruit flies skimp on the sperm count, females simply mate with more partners. Something male flies might keep in mind if they want to avoid heartbreak this holiday season.

—Karen Hopkin 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe