Future Smog Looks More Persistent

Computer models show that increased levels of greenhouse gases, along with their trapped heat, will make the atmosphere more stagnant, leading to many more days of unhealthy air. David Biello reports.

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Polluted air causes more than 2.6 million people to die prematurely each year. And when the smog builds up in Los Angeles or Beijing it sits there until a cleansing rain or a clearing wind freshens the air.
 
So what does the future hold for the number of days in which the air is not fair? According to some new computer model simulations, nothing good. The atmosphere is going to get more stagnant thanks to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and the heat they trap, leading to as many as 40 more bad air days annually around much of the globe.

That's according to a study in the journal Nature Climate Change. [Daniel E. Horton et al, Occurrence and persistence of future atmospheric stagnation events]

India will be worst hit by such atmospheric stagnation, according to the computers. But nobody escapes, including the U.S.
 
Of course, there’s a way to ward off this predicted outcome. It already made sense to try to stop pollutants like soot and ozone from entering the air in the first place and to cut back on the emissions of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. Now it seems we’d get the additional benefit of preventing the increase in the number of bad air days. Just trying to clear the air here.
 
—David Biello
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 
[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe