New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Supernova Turned Star Inside-Out

When the star Cassiopeia A exploded, nearly all the iron from the core was expelled to the outer regions of the supernova. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s a blast from the not-too-distant past.

Cassiopeia A is a giant, expanding shell of debris about 11,000 light-years away. It’s one of the youngest remnants of a supernova, an exploded star, in our galaxy. The light from the explosion first reached eyes on Earth around 1670.

But only with the advent of modern telescopes has the supernova’s nature really come to light. Because a few years ago astronomers concluded that the explosion followed the collapse of a massive star. Now an accounting of the material cast outward in the supernova is giving astrophysicists clues to the explosion itself.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers used one million seconds of observing time on the orbiting Chandra X-Ray Observatory to carefully scan the supernova remnant. That’s more than 11 days on one of NASA’s premier telescopes. What they found, among other things, was that the ejecta from the supernova has not spread outward evenly.

Instead, nearly all the iron from the core of the star has been expelled to the outer regions of the supernova remnant. The supernova essentially turned the star inside out. [Una Hwang and J. Martin Laming, "A Chandra X-Ray Survey Of Ejecta In The Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant" in The Astrophysical Journal]

Think about that—and be glad your ancestors were 11,000 light-years away when it happened.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe