Supernova Turned Star Inside-Out

When the star Cassiopeia A exploded, nearly all the iron from the core was expelled to the outer regions of the supernova. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s a blast from the not-too-distant past.

Cassiopeia A is a giant, expanding shell of debris about 11,000 light-years away. It’s one of the youngest remnants of a supernova, an exploded star, in our galaxy. The light from the explosion first reached eyes on Earth around 1670.

But only with the advent of modern telescopes has the supernova’s nature really come to light. Because a few years ago astronomers concluded that the explosion followed the collapse of a massive star. Now an accounting of the material cast outward in the supernova is giving astrophysicists clues to the explosion itself.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers used one million seconds of observing time on the orbiting Chandra X-Ray Observatory to carefully scan the supernova remnant. That’s more than 11 days on one of NASA’s premier telescopes. What they found, among other things, was that the ejecta from the supernova has not spread outward evenly.

Instead, nearly all the iron from the core of the star has been expelled to the outer regions of the supernova remnant. The supernova essentially turned the star inside out. [Una Hwang and J. Martin Laming, "A Chandra X-Ray Survey Of Ejecta In The Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant" in The Astrophysical Journal]

Think about that—and be glad your ancestors were 11,000 light-years away when it happened.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe