New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Teach Science Process over Findings

Seismologist and policy advisor Lucy Jones says science education needs to teach how science works more than just what it finds out.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“I think we all agree that there is a crisis, even, in our society about how we use science. We all know about climate change denial on one side, but there's also all the issues about opposing GMO's or anti-vaccination.”

Lucy Jones. She’s a seismologist and a policy advisor on earthquake risk. She spoke February 17th at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C.

“And what we are seeing here is there is a significant part of society that doesn't understand how the scientific process works. And looks at scientific information as something you get told to believe because the scientists said it's true. And then if you’re believe that authority figure, there are several others you could turn to as well.”   


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So, what to do? In 2016 she founded the Dr. Lucy Jones Center for Science and Society, which tries to get the public and policy makers to use scientific information to improve the resiliency of their communities. And here’s a brief portion of her talk proposing solutions to the problem of the gap between scientists and society.

“We need to look at science education for the broader public more focused on process rather than results. And this is another place where the internet has really changed things. When I was in school, if you want to learn those facts, you sort of had to get it from the teachers and learn enough to be able to go out and start doing research. Now if you want a result you can get it on your computer right away. What we need to do is not be teaching kids, for instance, that dinosaurs evolved into chickens, but rather how to recognize that the ‘connection-between-dinosaurs-and-the avian-species’ Web site is more reliable than one that tells us we descended from visitors from Mars. Both of them are out there on the internet.”

You can listen to Lucy Jones’s entire talk. Just look for the annual meeting live stream at meetings.aaas.org.

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe