Tech Consequences Voiced by Carnegie Mellon Prez
At the World Economic Forum, Carnegie Mellon president Subra Suresh talks about dealing with the unintended consequences of ever more sophisticated intelligent devices
By Mariette DiChristina & Steve Mirsky
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Subra Suresh: “With every invention and every technology we have a lot of intended benefits and intended consequences. Simultaneously, we have many unintended consequences.”
Steve Mirsky: Subra Suresh, an engineer by training, is president of Carnegie Mellon University and former director of the National Science Foundation. He spoke on January 23rd at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, to Scientific American Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina.
MD: “I’ve also been hearing some critiques and concerns about what’s going to happen as machines grow more intelligent.”
SS: “As machines become more and more sophisticated, we have to be very careful about issues of privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property. If people from discipline and one part of the world go and mine proprietary information from another part of the world, either legally or illegally, what are the consequences of this? We’ve already seen leak of information because of breach of cybersecurity. And I think those kind of issues are going to be there. But in that sense, artificial intelligence and machine learning are no different from any other new wave of technology that has the potential to be used as well as abused.”
SM: For more from Subra Suresh, check our website, www.scientificamerican.com, for an upcoming edition of the Science Talk podcast.
—Steve Mirsky
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
