Teenage Clockmaker Upholds Long Scientific Tradition

As Daniel Boorstin, former director of the Smithsonian National Museum of History, once put it, clockmakers were the "pioneer scientific instrument makers"  

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“It was destined to be the mother of machines.” The “it” Daniel Boorstin talks about in his 1983 book The Discoverers is the clock. Boorstin, who served as the director of the National Museum of History and Technology of the Smithsonian Institution went on to write, “The clock broke down the walls between kinds of knowledge, ingenuity, and skill, and clockmakers were the first consciously to apply the theories of mechanics and physics to the making of machines…clockmakers became the pioneer scientific-instrument makers.”

It’s therefore particularly ironic that 14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed got yanked out of his Texas 9th grade classroom September 14th, handcuffed, interrogated, and eventually suspended, for having brought to school a clock he’d built himself. Because the adults present thought it could be a bomb. Hey, it was ticking, wasn’t it, this recapitulation of the work that helped make the modern, science-driven world?

Of course, things have worked out okay. Mohamed is going to transfer to a less easily startled school, the President invited him to the White House and he’s been asked to attend the Google Science Fair taking place during the next few days in California. Scientific American is one of the sponsors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Back to Boorstin. He concludes his 1973 book The Americans: the Democratic Experience, with these lines: “The atomic bomb along with the space adventure and a thousand lesser daily demonstrations—the automobile and the airplane, radio and television, computer technology and automation, and the myriad products of Research and Development—were showing that the ‘advance’ of science and technology…would control the daily lives of Americans.” Unless, that is, they give way to fear. Tick tock.

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe