Teens and Docs Abstain from Sex Talk

In annual physicals teens and docs failed to talk sex a third of the time and usually too briefly when the subject was addressed. Dina Fine Maron reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Teenagers talk about sex—but not enough with their doctors.

A North Carolina-based study of teenagers’ annual routine physicals finds that a third of the time the subject of sex, sexuality or dating never comes up.  When sex is discussed, it usually gets only a cursory mention—an average of 36 seconds in an annual checkup that averages 22 minutes.

The research team studied the interactions between physicians and 253 teens at 11 North Carolina clinics. The results are in the journal JAMA Pediatrics. [Stewart C. Alexander et al., Sexuality Talk During Adolescent Health Maintenance Visits]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When docs did initiate the talk, it was almost twice as likely to be with girls. That’s a missed opportunity to talk about sexual health and safety, especially with boys, the researchers say.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that doctors dive in on discussing sexual information, even if the docs themselves may feel uncomfortable. And such chats need to last longer than a few seconds. The time invested could pay off in lower rates of sexually transmitted disease and teen pregnancy.

—Dina Fine Maron

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Related JAMA Pediatrics editorial: Will You Ask? Will They Tell You? Are You Ready to Hear and Respond? Barriers to Physician-Adolescent Discussion about Sexuality]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe