That's What Ya Call a 4-Star Planet

Astronomers report the discovery of only the second quadruple-star system known to host at least one planet. But they suspect there are a lot more such systems out there. Lee Billings reports
 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In his 1941 short story Nightfall,Isaac Asimov describes a planet called Lagash that resides in a multistar system. Constantly illuminated from all sides by its, count 'em, six suns, Lagash experiences dark skies for just a few hours once every 2,000 years. In the story the rare celestial alignment occurs and darkness descends for the first time in living memory—at which point the inhabitants of Lagash go berserk and burn their cities.
 
Nightfall was sci-fi, but we now know the kinds of multistar planetary systems it describes are real— and more common than once thought. For example, astronomers recently realized that a planet-hosting star system has four suns, the second of its kind ever found. The finding is in the Astronomical Journal. [Lewis C. Roberts, Jr. et al, Know the Star, Know the Planet. III. Discovery of Late-Type Companions to Two Exoplanet Host Stars]
 
Our galaxy contains hundreds of billions of stars, and astronomers suspect planets accompany almost all of them. This latest work implies that about 4 percent of sunlike stars may exist in quadruple systems. That’s a lot of potential Lagashes.
 
The system just found, called 30 Ari, is 136 light-years from Earth, in the constellation Aries. We had known of three stars there as well as a planet 10 times bigger than Jupiter. The fourth star is the new discovery.
 
The system is arranged as two binary pairs that orbit each other at a distance more than a thousand times that between the Earth and our sun. The known planet orbits one star in one pair. Its sky would contain two suns, and the more distant binary pair would appear as two very bright stars, visible even during daylight.
 
If the planet and all four of 30 Ari’s stars are coplanar, night could come to one hemisphere of the world only once every several millennia, when all four stars briefly align on the opposite side. But put aside any Asimovian fears. Life as we know it could not exist on the gas-giant planet, and its nearby suns would incinerate any cities all on their own. No frenzied inhabitants required.
 
—Lee Billings
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk editor for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe