March 10, 2009

The Baby Nobels

SciAm.com met up with the 40 finalists of the Intel Science Talent Search, considered the "Super Bowl" of science. Christie Nicholson reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly

Apple | Spotify | YouTube | RSS

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast. Please note that this special podcast is double the length of our usual one-minute podcasts.]

So check this out: "Hi my name is Adi Rajagopalan, I'm going on 18 in a few days, and my project was Modelling Synergistic Cellulolytic-Hemicellulolytic Enzyme Complexes for Lignocellulosic Hydrolysis."

And this: "Hi my name is Christine Shrock, I'm 18 and my project is Effects of Lid Dynamics on the Binding of MDM2 to the Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 with Implications for Cancer Therapeutics."

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Now does that sound like any science fair project you created? Yeah me neither. But these two bright young students are finalists in the pinnacle of all science fairs, the Intel Science Talent Search, sometimes referred to as the “baby nobels,” where 40 of America’s brightest scientific talents were chosen from more than 1,600 high school applicants.

Intel and the Society for Science and the Public, rewarded finalists with a trip to D.C., where they presented their projects at the National Academy of Sciences, and yesterday, discussed the importance of math and science in a meeting with President Obama.

Since its launch as the Westinghouse Science Talent Search, in 1942, finalist alumni have won seven Nobel Prizes, two Fields Medals, three National Medals of Science and ten MacArthur Foundation Fellowships.

So let’s translate those two projects mentioned earlier.

Here’s Adi’s again, "Modelling Synergistic Cellulolytic-Hemicellulolytic Enzyme Complexes for Lignocellulosic Hydrolysis," Which means,"I basically built mathematical models which helped us reduce the cost of a type of alternative energy called cellulosic ethanol."

And here’s Christine’s: "Effects of Lid Dynamics on the Binding of MDM2 to the Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 with Implications for Cancer Therapeutics," and this translates to, "just changing the shape of a little part of a molecule to help cure cancer."

Simple right? Uh yeah.

Tonight at a black tie gala award ceremony at the Mellon Auditorium the best of the best will be awarded nearly a half a million dollars in scholarships and prizes, including the grand prize of $100,000. Stay tuned, results will be posted on SciAm.com.

—Christie Nicholson

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American