The Curious Case of Bees

Honeybees: A European import vital to food production--or are they? David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

Spring is in the air and as flowers bloom, honeybees buzz into action, pollinating from now until late fall. Humans add to that bee business, trucking the insects across country to pollinate vast fields of crops, from almonds in California to apples in Maine.

While this sounds like the most natural thing for the honeybees, they are technically an invasive species in North America.

That's right, the seemingly sweet honeybee is a human-introduced European import crowding out native species, such as the blue orchard bee. Not unlike zebra mussels or kudzu.

But honeybees are a useful invader. With other insects, they provide some $57 billion worth of free ecosystem services, such as pollination.

That's why scientists sprang into action as reports of a mysterious disease wiping out bee hives swarmed in 2007 and 2008. Dubbed colony collapse disorder, the deaths have been linked to pesticides, disease and overwork. For more on that, check out our online In-Depth Report this week "The Buzz on Bees."

While studies have shown that our native bees could pinch pollinate for the European imports, their populations are too small to fill the honeybee's role.

Fortunately, early reports from this winter are promising. Honeybees seem to be recovering. That's sweet news for farmers, foodies and, yes, honey lovers.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe