New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The Curious Case of Bees

Honeybees: A European import vital to food production--or are they? David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

Spring is in the air and as flowers bloom, honeybees buzz into action, pollinating from now until late fall. Humans add to that bee business, trucking the insects across country to pollinate vast fields of crops, from almonds in California to apples in Maine.

While this sounds like the most natural thing for the honeybees, they are technically an invasive species in North America.

That's right, the seemingly sweet honeybee is a human-introduced European import crowding out native species, such as the blue orchard bee. Not unlike zebra mussels or kudzu.

But honeybees are a useful invader. With other insects, they provide some $57 billion worth of free ecosystem services, such as pollination.

That's why scientists sprang into action as reports of a mysterious disease wiping out bee hives swarmed in 2007 and 2008. Dubbed colony collapse disorder, the deaths have been linked to pesticides, disease and overwork. For more on that, check out our online In-Depth Report this week "The Buzz on Bees."

While studies have shown that our native bees could pinch pollinate for the European imports, their populations are too small to fill the honeybee's role.

Fortunately, early reports from this winter are promising. Honeybees seem to be recovering. That's sweet news for farmers, foodies and, yes, honey lovers.

—David Biello

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe