The Jellyfish Menace

Are humans making the oceans fit only for jellyfish? David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A silent, blobbing menace swarms the seas, thanks to overfishing, climate change and even "dead zones". Jellyfish seem set to regain their dominance of the oceans in future—and that could be bad news for humans. The two-meter long jellyfish known as Nomura have begun swarming year after year off the coast of Japan, 500 million or more of them fouling fishing nets thanks to agricultural runoff from China spurring plankton blooms. With fewer fish, the Nomura giants can dominate.In fact, jellyfish are quite good at proliferating, even when circumstances are less than favorable. Just eight years after comb jellies first entered the Black Sea, they became the most numerous animal. And various jellyfish are among the only animals that can survive in the more than 400 ocean areas devoid of oxygen around the world—more commonly known as dead zones. Jellyfish mess with humans, too—from the deadly stings of box jellies to clogging water-intake pipes at nuclear power plants. This year the as much as 200-kilogram Nomuras actually capsized a 10-ton fishing trawler off the coast of Japan. Ultimately, our only hope may be to acquire a taste for the gelatinous creatures. Jellyfish burger, anyone?—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe