The YouTube SpaceLab Competition

If you're 14 to 18 years old, you still have until December 14th to prepare a two-minute video of a suggestion for an experiment to be performed at the International Space Station and upload it to youtube.com/spacelab. Winners will see their experiment performed in space

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Podcast Transcription

Steve:          Steve Mirsky here. It's December 12th which means, if you're 14 to 18 years old, you still have a couple of days left to enter the YouTubeSpace Lab competition. Scientific American editor in chief Mariette DiChristina is one of the judges. She recently explained the competition to the ubiquitous Al Roker on his morning program on the Weather Channel.

Roker:          In an effort to inspire the next generation of scientists and astronauts, Google, YouTube and Lenovo have created a one of a kind competition called Spacelab. It calls on high school students all around the world to design experiments that'll actually be performed on the International Space Station. Mariette DiChristina is the editor in chief of Scientific American and one of the judges in the competition. Mariette, good to see you.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


DiChristina: Good morning. Good to see you.

Roker:          This is really exciting. I mean a one of a kind competition. So how does this work exactly?

DiChristina: So, kids think big, right? And if you think big, there's nothing bigger than the International Space Station and looking to get to your experiment up in space. So 14- to 18-year-old kids, who have a big idea can make a two-minute video and upload it to YouTube Spacelab and get that science experiment idea considered for actually launching on the International Space Station.

Roker:          You had 14 million views to the Space Lab Web site—5,500 experiments submitted so far. You're part of this judging panel, which is a pretty impressive panel. Tell us about that, and how do you make the decision?

DiChristina: Right. So, judging is going to be really great fun because of all these wonderful ideas. The students are sending ideas in physics and also in biology to do on the International Space Station. The response has been completely gratifying. Yes, I am one of the judges. Also Stephen Hawking, so you may have heard of him. Also many space organizations: NASA, the European Space Agency, JAXA and many other organizations will help screen so that we get the best two ideas up there.

Roker:          Now these are—this scares me because when I was in high school I was trying to make an electromagnet—one of the submissions is to determine the effects of microgravity on quorum sensing in a bacterium known as Vibrio fischeri. This isdesigned by 15-year-olds.

DiChristina: Isn't that awesome? Let me break that down for you.

Roker:          Wow!

DiChristina: First of all, these are amazing bacteria that live in the water, and they produce something called bioluminescence—a glow to you and me—and the question is here, and this is one of the great examples of a biology experiment, is what role does gravity play on the production of that glow that the amazing bacteria make under water. Do you need gravity to actually have that happen? What happens in the physical systems if it isn't there? And so the students are thinking, "Well, maybe if it's flying up in space, maybe we won't see it glow." That's their hypothesis. But we'll see if they're among the two winners who get to go up to the International Space Station with their experiments.

Roker:          So you lost me at, "Here's how this works."

DiChristina: (laughs) Come on.

Roker:          So they actually get to go up there with their experiments?

DiChristina: No they don't go up there, just the experiments.

Roker:          They don't, but their experiment does. If kids, these junior geniuses, do want to enter, how do they do this?

DiChristina: All they need to do is make a two-minute video, upload it to YouTube Spacelab, which is https://www.youtube.com/spacelab, and put their idea in there. And it will feel like—if I made it sound like they're going to go up there—it will feel like that because we're going to see it, the whole world will be able to see it on a live stream, which is really cool.

Roker:          That is just amazing. Mariette, thank you so much.

DiChristina: Make a two-minute video upload it to YouTube Spacelab, which is https://www.youtube.com/spacelab.

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe