Three Large Rivers Once Split Sahara

Climate models indicate that 100,000 years ago, stormwater would have formed three large rivers running north through the Sahara. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Sahara desert isn't known for its greenery. But there's evidence it was once much lusher than today, dotted with water holes and lakes. Now a study suggests that three massive rivers used to plough through the desert, too—cutting pathways north to the Mediterranean coast.

Researchers used climate models to estimate rainfall more than 100,000 years ago. They found that ancient monsoons formed 400 miles north of where they do today, spilling rain on mountains in the central Sahara. That storm water would have drained north, powering three rivers the size of the Nile, and forming vast wetlands in what is now Libya.

The westernmost river, referred to as the Irharhar, was the most likely path for migrants—and clusters of archaeological sites in Algeria and Tunisia back up that idea. The analysis is in the journal PLoS ONE. [Tom J. Coulthard et al., Were Rivers Flowing across the Sahara During the Last Interglacial? Implications for Human Migration through Africa]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There's no telling whether humans made it to Europe by these routes. But the alternatives were travelling along Africa's west coast, or up the Nile—so these three ancient rivers would have offered a nice shortcut. Now, of course, the waterways are buried beneath the dunes, along  with any footprints our ancestors may have left behind.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]    

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe