Tiny Wormlike Creature May Be Our Oldest Known Ancestor

The bilateral organism crawled on the seafloor, taking in organic matter at one end and dumping the remains out the other some 555 million years ago.

Artist's rendering of Ikaria wariootia.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Half a billion years ago, there existed a wormlike creature the size of a grain of rice. And a new study finds that this animal may have been the first to crawl around the seafloor, gobble up organic matter at one end and poop it out the other end. The creature, dubbed Ikaria wariootia, was probably one of our oldest relatives.

Ikaria is maybe the oldest bilaterian animal that we find in the fossil record. So this is twice as old or more than things like dinosaurs.”

University of California, Riverside paleontologist Scott Evans. He says animals like sponges are even more ancient, but they lack the bilateral symmetry that characterizes most animals today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“So a front and a back and a symmetrical left and right side. And bilaterians also have an opening for food to go in, an opening for waste to go out and a gut connecting them, basically a tube. And really, most animals, everything from insects to mammals to us, those are all bilaterians that are around today.”

Evans and his colleagues discovered the humble creatures in fossil layers from the Ediacara Hills of South Australia. They used 3-D laser scanners from NASA to make high-resolution images of Ikaria and the surfaces they lived on. The scans confirmed the animals’ bilateral body morphology and revealed the shape of the burrows they left from scavenging the seafloor. 

“It probably had a body that was divided into what we refer to as modules, or units or segments. And because of the way it moved through the sediment, we think it had muscles and probably moved similar to how an earthworm moves by sort of extending and contracting its body using those muscle groups.”

Later animals built off of Ikaria’s basic body morphology—which featured a small front end and a larger rear end.

“It doesn't have a head or a tail, but it’s starting that type of body organization by which things can build a head and a tail.”

What’s more, Ikaria had the ability to sense the environment around it.

“And sense where food was and where oxygen was, which is also a critical evolutionary step in these early animals.”

The study is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Scott D. Evans et al., Discovery of the oldest bilaterian from the Ediacaran of South Australia]

It might not seem like we share that much with a 555-million-year-old fossil, but looks can be deceiving. There’s probably a little bit of Ikaria in all of us.

—Susanne Bard

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Susanne Bard is a science writer and multimedia producer based on the West Coast. She has created content for Scientific American, Science magazine, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, as well as for museums and zoos.

More by Susanne Bard

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe