New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Tiny Wormlike Creature May Be Our Oldest Known Ancestor

The bilateral organism crawled on the seafloor, taking in organic matter at one end and dumping the remains out the other some 555 million years ago.

Artist's rendering of Ikaria wariootia.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Half a billion years ago, there existed a wormlike creature the size of a grain of rice. And a new study finds that this animal may have been the first to crawl around the seafloor, gobble up organic matter at one end and poop it out the other end. The creature, dubbed Ikaria wariootia, was probably one of our oldest relatives.

Ikaria is maybe the oldest bilaterian animal that we find in the fossil record. So this is twice as old or more than things like dinosaurs.”

University of California, Riverside paleontologist Scott Evans. He says animals like sponges are even more ancient, but they lack the bilateral symmetry that characterizes most animals today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“So a front and a back and a symmetrical left and right side. And bilaterians also have an opening for food to go in, an opening for waste to go out and a gut connecting them, basically a tube. And really, most animals, everything from insects to mammals to us, those are all bilaterians that are around today.”

Evans and his colleagues discovered the humble creatures in fossil layers from the Ediacara Hills of South Australia. They used 3-D laser scanners from NASA to make high-resolution images of Ikaria and the surfaces they lived on. The scans confirmed the animals’ bilateral body morphology and revealed the shape of the burrows they left from scavenging the seafloor. 

“It probably had a body that was divided into what we refer to as modules, or units or segments. And because of the way it moved through the sediment, we think it had muscles and probably moved similar to how an earthworm moves by sort of extending and contracting its body using those muscle groups.”

Later animals built off of Ikaria’s basic body morphology—which featured a small front end and a larger rear end.

“It doesn't have a head or a tail, but it’s starting that type of body organization by which things can build a head and a tail.”

What’s more, Ikaria had the ability to sense the environment around it.

“And sense where food was and where oxygen was, which is also a critical evolutionary step in these early animals.”

The study is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Scott D. Evans et al., Discovery of the oldest bilaterian from the Ediacaran of South Australia]

It might not seem like we share that much with a 555-million-year-old fossil, but looks can be deceiving. There’s probably a little bit of Ikaria in all of us.

—Susanne Bard

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Susanne Bard is a science writer and multimedia producer based on the West Coast. She has created content for Scientific American, Science magazine, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, as well as for museums and zoos.

More by Susanne Bard

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe