Top Predator Losses Disrupt Ecosystems

The loss of top carnivores could alter the dynamics of disease and wildfires and have unintended consequences for ecosystems. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What human activity has the biggest impact on the planet? I took an informal poll of New Yorkers: "Driving, day to day commuting.” “Eating too much meat.” “Using too many resources, I think.” “Factory farming.” “Driving.”

Here's something I didn't hear: killing off the world's top carnivores, like tigers, wolves and bears. Scientists say it's an overlooked problem with effects that ripple through ecosystems in unexpected ways. When otters disappear, for example, urchins take over, decimating kelp forests.

Researchers reviewed the conservation status of 31 of the world's largest carnivorous mammals. They found that some two-thirds are threatened, living on a fraction of their former range. And nearly all are decreasing in number, apart from a few exceptions, like grizzlies and black bears. Their analysis appears in the journal Science. [William J. Ripple et al., Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The loss of top carnivores could alter the dynamics of disease and wildfires, they say, and have unintended consequences for ecosystems. So either we learn to coexist with these predators or their disappearance may come back to bite us.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe