Underground Nukes Leave Traceable Uplift

Surface rock above a nuclear test will expand enough to be trackable by radar satellites. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If a country wants to keep a nuclear bomb test secret, it’ll probably do it deep underground. But even if you bury the bomb, some clues will reach the surface. So says a study in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. [P. Vincent et al., "Anomalous transient uplift observed at the Lop Nor, China nuclear test site using satellite radar interferometry time‐series analysis"]

Scientists analyzed radar satellite data of a spot in western China, where three nukes were detonated underground in the ‘90s. And they found that after the blasts, the land above the test chambers gradually swelled one inch higher in elevation.

Here’s why: shock waves from the explosion left cracks in rock near the surface. Years later, plumes of underground water, still steamy from the blast, trickled up and infiltrated those cracks,  causing the rock to expand and rise—forensic evidence that could be used to infer the bomb’s explosive energy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The International Atomic Energy Agency won’t be busting nuclear rebels with this method anytime soon—it took four years for this bulge in the Chinese desert to appear.* But since seismic analysis—the other tool for studying bomb blasts—can be foiled by a cleverly designed detonation chamber, this trick gives nuclear detectives one more way to study blasts from the past.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.] 

*Clarification (1/13/12): Although the IAEA monitors the use of fissile materials, verification that no nation has violated the ban on nuclear testing is done by the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Organization.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe